Mission Statement - Was Re: Aeolus Developer Conference Report. ACKS REQUIRED BY NOV 13.

Hugh Brock hbrock at redhat.com
Wed Nov 14 17:44:49 UTC 2012


Apologies folks, I'm out of pocket for the next couple days and haven't had a second to organize this vote. It'll be Friday unless someone else wants to organize it sooner. 

-hugh

-------- Original Message --------
 From: Justin Clift <jclift at redhat.com>
 Sent: Wed, 14/11/2012 12:19 PM
 To: aeolus-devel <aeolus-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org>
 CC: 
 Subject: Mission Statement - Was Re: Aeolus Developer Conference Report. ACKS	REQUIRED BY NOV 13.

On 14/11/2012, at 3:00 PM, Scott Seago wrote:
<snip>
> Hmm. OK, I guess to me it's fairly clear that if we can handle >1, we can handle 1 too, but I have no real objections to mentioning both, if it can be done in such a way that everyone agrees to the wording. What is essential, though, is that we do mention multi-instance systems, since that's a huge part of what we do. In other words, by all means lets make it clear that we handle "one or more instances" -- but not at the expense of not making it equally clear that we handle complex multi-instance systems well.

Hmmm, we seem to have started bike-shedding on the mission
statement a while back. ;)

Let's get the list of mission statement candidates written
up, then vote to pick the winner.

+ Justin

--
Aeolus Cloud Evangelist
http://www.aeolusproject.org




More information about the aeolus-devel mailing list