Website Cabal

Justin Clift jclift at redhat.com
Tue Nov 13 14:19:42 UTC 2012


On 13/11/2012, at 3:05 PM, Mo Morsi wrote:
<snip>
> Since the website doesn't require much verification other than viewing
> it and manually making sure it looks good, can't we just push updates to
> the website?
> 
> Or perhaps send pull requests, but unless there are any critical
> objections, those get automatically ack'd after 2 or 3 days? (comments
> and suggestions on the pull request should be addressed but after that
> they shouldn't be considered critical objections unless explicitly
> indicated). Of course explicit ACKs can be pushed immediately.
> 
> That way the website is continuously being updated and if someone
> doesn't like a change they can easily send an additional pull request
> and push additional patches ontop of those changes. Perhaps in the case
> of differences in opinion, Hugh (or whoever he designates) can have the
> final say.

Sounds like Mo's volunteered, so I'm confirming my
withdrawal. :)

For Mo's suggestion, I'll leave that to everyone
else to decide on, etc. :>

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

--
Aeolus Cloud Evangelist
http://www.aeolusproject.org




More information about the aeolus-devel mailing list