Christoph Wickert wrote :
> I read it a few days ago. My questions were already been
discussed, indeed.
> But I thought that pointing this topic with a new discussion was a quite
> good idea.
>
> All what I try to say is, maybe a better looking Xfce spin would be more
> appealing.
Sure, we all agree on that, but we are not sure if Greybird is the way
to go. I pointed out some usability issues and I prefer going with
Bridge because
* it's more restrained
* it provides the same "corporate identity" as Adwaita/GNOME.
No
problem, Greybird was just a suggestion among others :)
I like Adwaita, and I loved the old Bluecurve setup.
> As I said previously, in my own case I really don't care.
> But a lot of users are looking after an alternative to Gnome3 (Gnome2
> refugees for example) and I think that Xfce is the most valuable here.
I am trying to not repeat myself and I don't want to sound rude, but I'd
like to emphasize that Xfce is *not* intended to be a GNOME clone. We
not aiming to deliver the best desktop for GNOME 3 refugees but the best
Xfce experience.
Whoever wants to help is welcome of course, so I appreciate your input.
I apologize
if I'm a bit annoying or whatever, my english is quite rusty
so I can't explain completely what I want to explain.
And be sure that I know and I agree about the fact that Xfce doesn't
aims to be the best Gnome3 refugees desktop, but the best Xfce desktop.
I run on Openbox, Awesome, other standalone WMs, and Xfce, so I'm not
one of those refugees, even if I tried Gnome3 sometimes.
And as you say, I try to contribute to this spin. I have created a
Fedora Remix but I would like to get involved into a more official project.
Kind regards,
Christoph
--
Alexandre "DarthWound" Singh
-->
darthwound.org <--