[Bug 245377] Update to 1.2.1??
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245377
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|john(a)ncphotography.com |limb(a)jcomserv.net
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-11 14:21:39 EDT ---
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning
to the new owner of this component.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Bug 247065] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247065
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|john(a)ncphotography.com |limb(a)jcomserv.net
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-11 14:21:32 EDT ---
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning
to the new owner of this component.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Bug 248408] Applet doesn't list running KVM domains
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248408
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|kzak(a)redhat.com |crobinso(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-11 12:24:44 EDT ---
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning
to the new owner of this component.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Bug 230181] anaconda identifies multiple drives as a multipath
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230181
randygalbraith <randy.galbraith(a)cox.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |randy.galbraith(a)cox.net
--- Comment #11 from randygalbraith <randy.galbraith(a)cox.net> 2009-02-10 21:15:53 EDT ---
FWIW: The comments in this bug regarding the "nompath" option (thank you!)
helped me work around this very issue with my Fedora 10 install yesterday
(February 9, 2009). Until I ran the install with the nompath option I could
not get Fedora to see my two 320gb SATA Maxstor drives. I tried various BIOS
settings and the nodmraid option which did not work. I even dd if=/dev/zero
of=/dev/sd[ab] when someone suggested "meta data" on the drives may be leading
Fedora install program to only suggest /dev/mapper option.
-Randy Galbraith
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months
[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246
Nigel Jones <bugs(a)cherrybyte.me.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bugs(a)cherrybyte.me.uk
--- Comment #31 from Nigel Jones <bugs(a)cherrybyte.me.uk> 2009-02-10 14:54:36 EDT ---
I'm getting this problem too. In my case it was occuring in F10, and is still
occuring in rawhide
Same as above: (from yum output)
Installing : kernel 48/178
grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
Installing : kernel-PAE 49/178
grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
I think my sym link is ok
sh-4.0# ls -la menu.lst
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2008-11-06 20:04 menu.lst -> ./grub.conf
My current menu.lst is
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that
# all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
# root (hd0,0)
# kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/rootlv
# initrd /initrd-version.img
#boot=/dev/sda
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title Fedora 11 (2.6.29-0.96.rc3.git12.fc11.i686.PAE)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.29-0.96.rc3.git12.fc11.i686.PAE ro nomodeset quiet
initrd /initrd-2.6.29-0.96.rc3.git12.fc11.i686.PAE.img
I have to update menu.lst manually each time. Tedious on rawhide :-(
COuld really do at least with grubby reporting a more useful error.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 4 months