Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246
Need Real Name <howarth(a)nitro.med.uc.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |howarth(a)nitro.med.uc.edu
--- Comment #29 from Need Real Name <howarth(a)nitro.med.uc.edu> 2009-02-05 16:00:29 EDT ---
I am seeing the same problem after upgrading a system on software RAID-1 from
Fedora 8 to 10. The Fedora 10 upgrade went fine except the boot loader upgrade
option didn't work (which I have seen on other systems before). I took the
usual route of repeating the upgrade but selecting the third option to install
a new boot loader. Now the Fedora 10 installation boots fine but when I did the
first yum update the rpm failed to install the entry in grub.conf with the
error
grubby fatal error unable to find a suitable template
I noticed that I had a grub,conf.rpmsave with...
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title Fedora (2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 ro root=/dev/md1 nodmraid rhgb
quiet
initrd /initrd-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64.img
but that the current grub.conf has...
default=0
timeout=0
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title Fedora (2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 ro
root=UUID=3adeca51-506e-4b51-aea7-c0ca9525ec36 nodmraid
initrd /initrd-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64.img
I was able to manually add the new kernel to grub.conf using /dev/md1 for
root. I am assuming that the new use of the UUID label is screwing up attempt
to add the grub entry when the new kernel is installed. I would also note that
this
machine was originally installed with Windows RAID drivers by the vendor so
that
I have to use nodmraid to keep dmraid from getting confused by the tattooing
on the drive. Perhaps this is related and the wrong labels are being read?
Any idea on how to debug this problem further?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246
--- Comment #28 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-05 14:56:15 EDT ---
*** Bug 484243 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221073
--- Comment #4 from Joe Orton <jorton(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-05 12:07:24 EDT ---
*** Bug 436724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242773
Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|ajax(a)redhat.com |bskeggs(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #7 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-05 11:57:55 EDT ---
Reassigning.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332821
Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
Flag|needinfo?(notting(a)redhat.co |
|m) |
--- Comment #14 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-05 10:41:11 EDT ---
Yes, thsi works now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247239
Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |UPSTREAM
--- Comment #9 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-05 08:43:28 EDT ---
Not going to get fixed for F9 or F10 either for that matter, changing the
stdout/stderr behavior of rpm would break loads of existing scripts so this is
not something that can be fixed "just like that".
Moving this to upstream tracking: http://rpm.org/ticket/31
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182498
Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-05 05:22:21 EDT ---
Fixed upstream now, bin and sbin directories are excluded from byte
compilation.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607
--- Comment #29 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-05 04:47:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Send too early Actually your problem can be solved with the mentioned bug in
> one go, but they are still slightly different. New bug or make the mentioned
> bug a "catch all symbol problems" one?
which was done here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483777
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607
--- Comment #28 from Tim Niemueller <tim(a)niemueller.de> 2009-02-05 04:39:30 EDT ---
Send too early Actually your problem can be solved with the mentioned bug in
one go, but they are still slightly different. New bug or make the mentioned
bug a "catch all symbol problems" one?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607
--- Comment #27 from Tim Niemueller <tim(a)niemueller.de> 2009-02-05 04:38:25 EDT ---
Please post your log to bug #470995 which is the appropriate one. This bug was
about the broken headers (misplaced files).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.