On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:13:32PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote:
Even though qla2xxx and qla2xxx_npiv are not represented
hierarchically in
configfs (they're peers) I'm wondering if that's not actually a mistake, and
preferable to present differently in targetcli. It might be clearer to show
it hierarchically -- create an "npivs" node:
qla2xxx
o- 20:00:00:00:00:00:00:55
o- acls
o- luns
o- npivs
in which "npivs/ create 5555666677778888 npiv_wwnn=1111222233334444"
would actually jump over to the qla2xxx_npiv configfs dir and set stuff up.
Or the qla2xxx_npiv configfs dir should go away in this form and
we should just have the npivs subdirectories?