( Sent this yesterday from the wrong account, didn't make the list )
Nailed it in one. I guess I had presumed that /etc/sysconfig/selinux was
authoritative.
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 457 May 11 08:32 selinux
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 May 10 08:12 selinux.gres ->
../selinux/config
Looks like I ran sed on the wrong file.
Eric
On 5/11/11 5:37 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/11/2011 04:41 PM, Dominick Grift wrote:
> On 05/11/2011 04:31 PM, Eric Warnke wrote:
>
>> The problems with corosync are a direct result of the system not
>> respecting the /etc/sysconfog/selinux directives.
>
> Is /etc/sysconfig/selinux also a symbolic links to /etc/selinux/config
> on your system?
>
> This is what i see on rawhide:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx. root root system_u:object_r:etc_t:s0 selinux ->
> ../selinux/config
>
> rpm -qf /etc/sysconfig/selinux
> selinux-policy-3.9.16-15.fc16.noarch
>
> My fedora 14 configuration seems to not even have a
> /etc/sysconfig/selinux softlink. Although rpm -qf /etc/sysconfig/selinux
> does return the selinux-policy package.
>
> What happens if you modify /etc/selinux/config directly?
>
>
- --
selinux mailing list
selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
Yes I would suspect you broke the link. /etc/selinux/config is the
correct location to modify with /etc/sysconfig/selinux a symbolic link
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk3LAZcACgkQrlYvE4MpobMlggCg5uZMoZ8ZD56YOl9+TAp8jTvF
yNgAni/6FMRqAXcF1bm64/xIlkSIMLrN
=pN7+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
selinux mailing list
selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux