Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Policy rename dilemma. I have a version of policy ready to go that
supports both strict and targeted policy. The version I wrote creates
targeted policy as policy and policy-sources and the strict as
policy-strict and policy-strict-sources. The problem with this is that
if I put it in Rawhide people upgrading will switch from strict policy
to relaxed and require a relabel. If I change it to strict equals
policy and policy-sources, with policy-targeted and
policy-targeted-sources, than I am stuck with that even though
policy-targeted will be the default in FC3, which seems wrong.
Comments?
Dan
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
If "targeted" will be the default going forward, it seems that the thing
to do is make the change now. A one time relabel at this stage is not as
bad as having to make a switch later.
For those that want the "strict" , they can set up the links the way
they prefer after the update.
Is the "strict" policy close to what is now in place?
Richard Hally