On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> I don't want to ship a desktop that doesn't let the
user do useful
>> things.
>
> And you can ship a desktop SPIN that way. But the base pkgs should
> not install with an insecure set of choices.
>
> if you want the spin to have a post-scriptlet which allows more
> things, then that's the choice of the desktop sig over the desktop
> spin.
Given how .pkla works, this is likely to be done with packages, not
with %post hackery. (Which should make it much easier to reliably
test, as well.)
provided those pkgs are not required anywhere or set in our default pkg
groups, then sure.
-sv