Fascinating. My test system, which I had believed was in compliance with
the current STIG, has
options ipv6 disable=1
in a /etc/modprobe.d file... Time to relook at this, then!
Perhaps this is why bonding is somewhat flaky on this system. Humph.
It sounds like it's coming live to my environment, so I get to include more
tests in my reports. Progress. I'll work through this one too.
Thanks again! All kinds of good information!
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 03:32:48 PM Andrew Gilmore wrote:
> > Put another way, its not that IPv6 is insecure...its very well tested.
> > that if you don't need it or use it and a security bulletin comes along
> > for it, its easy to dismiss because you didn't intend to use it.
> This was part of my real question, I guess. Much of what I had heard
> IPV6 focused on the relative maturity of the stack, compared to IPV4, and
> suggested that some of the same types of critical vulnerabilities that we
> saw in the 90s may be lurking in this stack. It's good to hear your
> confidence in the tech.
Let me explain a bit. In the first draft of the SNAC guide, I think it said
something like to disable do
install ipv6 /bin/true
This worked back in 2008 because IPv6 and IPv4 were separate. There was not
much overlap in code. However, things progress over the years and people
wondered why they have to make bug fixes to 2 independent code paths when
could be shared. At this point, if you tried to do the above method for
disabling IPv6, you'd find the following broken:
- various iSCSI drivers
- assorted bits of netfliter
Additionally, routing information, ARP entries, and ipv6 specific device
are shared between modules. So, there really is a lot of "ipv6" code
on a "ipv4" system. In light of this, the way of turning of IPv6 had to
because of the shared code base. We now recommend
because ipv6 must be loaded because it does get used. i was told that 1/2
the IPv6 codebase is shared with IPv4.
To circle back to the beginning, So, why turn it off at all? Because the
half of the IPv6 stack is not used all the time and eliminating lines of
helps harden the system.