On 9/16/13 10:38 PM, Jeffrey Blank wrote:
Sad face.
cry baby
http://people.redhat.com/swells/4jeff.txt
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Shawn Wells <shawn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 9/16/13 10:31 PM, Jeffrey Blank wrote:
>> Ah, this is an interesting point. I might be first interested in
>> seeing generation of a kickstart %post script from the remediation
>> content here, but this is definitely worth considering.
> Backup copies of the files would be incredibly trivial to add.
>
> As for KS file:
>
> oscap xccdf eval --profile stig-rhel6-server \
> --results /var/www/html/ssg-results/results.xml \
> --report /var/www/html/ssg-results/report.html \
> --cpe-dict ssg-rhel6-cpe-dictionary.xml \
> ssg-rhel6-xccdf.xml ; \
> oscap xccdf generate fix \
> --result-id xccdf_org.open-scap_testresult_stig-rhel6-server \
> /var/www/html/ssg-results/results.xml \
>> /var/www/html/ssg-results/script.sh ; \
> cat /var/www/html/ssg-results/script.sh
>
>
>
>> Related: do we have a handle on how many changes are needed from a
>> default RHEL installation?
> ~200
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Leam Hall<leamhall(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Shawn,
>>>>
>>>> One of the things I'm doing with Aqueduct is ensuring that we make
>>>> backup
>>>> copies of files. This is something my user base has strongly requested
>>>> and
>>>> their concerns are valid; if we run a fix tool with hundreds of changes,
>>>> and
>>>> the server looses functionality, being able to quickly see what was
>>>> changed
>>>> and fix/revert becomes critical.
>>>>
>>>> Leam