On Thursday, March 15, 2012 09:10:23 AM Spencer R. Shimko wrote:
>> Are you thinking of something significantly different from
the secstate
>> effort?
>
>There is a lot of overlap between what is shipped with RHEL and secstate.
>We
>have had teleconferences on combining codebases somewhat, but that was a
>long
>time ago. We can restart that discussion if you want, but not on this
>mail list.
Sounds good. We'll sync up separately.
I think the topic at-hand focuses on requirement content and remediation
content - not the tools.
I thought secstate was a tool and not content. Is there more to secstate than
code? I might have missed that.
As of right now I think this list is the best place to have those
conversations.
For content, sure.
However if the general sentiment of the list is that remediation
needs to be
discussed elsewhere (since it won't be SCAP) I'll happily move it to the CLIP
mailing list.
Is that where you discuss the secstate code? I was thinking of the openscap mail
list which is where all the previous discussion of secstate/openscap code
merging occurred. :)
-Steve