The goal was to wrap that up by COB today and push it to the list, but
that's likely to be handled early (very early) next week.
On 02/07/2013 02:36 PM, Jeffrey Blank wrote:
> This was not driven by the USGCB Profile. I'll do that next
(soon, as I
> must adapt, undoubtedly augment, the RHEL6 USGCB profile and field a
> draft variant by Monday, and it will likely address all Rules found in
> scap-security-guide, including ones that will be deemed optional). Note
> that not all Rules have CCEs. Perhaps some should.
Yes. David is looking into that now.