So, I'm late to the party.
I'm voting for vertical-top followed by horizontal-top.
Trevor
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Andrew Gilmore <agilmore2(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1 for horizontal, although every implementation is using too much
whitespace for logo.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> since one image is better than thousand words, have put together couple
> of examples how it could look like:
> [1]
http://jlieskov.fedorapeople.org/logos/
>
> The rhel6-guide.html is the vanilla one (how it looks now), then the
> proposals
> are as follows (legend: filename = icon + text orientation + if the image
> is at the top or at bottom),
> e.g.:
> * rhel6-guide-horizontal-top.html - the "SCAP Security Guide" is on the
> side wrt to the logo, whole
> image is inserted at the top,
> * rhel6-guide-vertical-bottom.html - the "SCAP Security Guide" text is
> below the logo, whole image
> got inserted at the bottom of the
> guide,
> * rhel6-guide-icononly-top.html - there's just logo (no text), image got
> inserted at the top
> * ... (see the other options)
>
> All of the icons are clickable (after click should bring the user to
> SSG's Fedorahosted's home page).
>
> If you have recommendations, where else on the page the logo could be
> inserted (and which one of
> them would be the most preferred one), please share. The dimensions (w x
> h) of the included image
> can be changed yet (decreased), if there would be impression this as
> generated now it would be too big.
>
> Also, since this is just draft, I have (hard) included the PNG versions
> of the particular image. Once
> (if) we are agreed, which version would be the most preferred one, I
> would start looking how
> to modify the build process to include the images on-the-fly & optimize
> the process as much as
> possible.
>
> Last, but not least, I am aware the *-bottom.html versions of the
> examples contain
> "SCAP Security Guide
https://fedorahosted.org/scap-security-guide" at
> the top of the page
> yet (didn't change this, since these are just drafts how the new guides
> could look like).
>
> Please vote / share your opinions, which of the versions you like the
> most (even if it should
> be the current / vanilla / not-changed one) with short argumentation why.
>
> Thank you && Regards, Jan.
> --
> Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Technologies Team
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Shawn Wells" <shawn(a)redhat.com>
> > To: "SCAP Security Guide"
<scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 1:40:32 PM
> > Subject: Re: [RFC] SCAP Security Guide icon to be included into HTML
> guides generated by SSG?
> >
> > +1
> >
> > (Especially since users can change w/local style sheets if desired)
> >
> > --
> > Shawn Wells
> > Director, Innovation Programs
> > shawn(a)redhat.com | 443.534.0130
> > @shawndwells
> >
> > On Jun 3, 2014, at 7:11 AM, Greg Elin < gregelin(a)gitmachines.com >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I recommend going with the powered by approach on all output so SSG logo
> > always present.
> >
> > Default company logo could be a "logo here" light gray placeholder
> image.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Jan Lieskovsky < jlieskov(a)redhat.com >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > since (for now [if we ever will]) we didn't change the name of the
> project,
> > and will keep the SCAP Security Guide one, and since we have received
> icons
> > for both of the alternatives (renaming to OpenSCAP SG, or staying with
> > current
> > name) of the project name, would like to check with you the following:
> >
> > Would the community want the SCAP Security Guide icon to be included in
> the
> > HTML version of the guide (for particular products), the SSG product
> creates
> > within the build process? Also, would we want this icon to be included
> on
> > the project wiki pages?
> >
> > Or would we rather want to stay with current position, having wiki page
> &
> > corresponding HTML guides vendor neutral, so they can be modified
> (according
> > to the subsequent needs) afterwards?
> >
> > Opinions for SVG icon inclusion / against it appreciated.
> >
> > Thank you && Regards, Jan.
> > --
> > Jan iankko Lieskovsky / Red Hat Security Technologies Team
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > scap-security-guide mailing list
> > scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> >
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > scap-security-guide mailing list
> > scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> >
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > scap-security-guide mailing list
> > scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> >
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
> >
> _______________________________________________
> scap-security-guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
>
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
--
Trevor Vaughan
Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc
(410) 541-6699
tvaughan(a)onyxpoint.com
-- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --