-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:29 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 06:38:50PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> * base100
>
https://github.com/AdamNiederer/base100
> Encode things into Emoji.
>
> Base💯 can represent any byte with a unique emoji symbol, therefore it ca
> n represent binary data with zero printable overhead (see caveats for more
> info).
Hmm, it seems that those package are not yet available.
I see that rust-base100 was built in koji, but it's not available in repos.
Same for fd-find and exa... Not sure what's going on here.
Hmm,
[root@e22df69ecc1c /]# dnf install base100 fd-find ripgrep tokei --assumeno
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:51 ago on Tue Nov 28 09:45:50 2017.
Dependencies resolved.
===============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
===============================================================================
Installing:
base100 x86_64 0.4.1-1.fc28 rawhide 347 k
fd-find x86_64 6.0.0-3.fc28 rawhide 679 k
ripgrep x86_64 0.7.1-5.fc28 rawhide 936 k
tokei x86_64 6.1.2-4.fc28 rawhide 555 k
Transaction Summary
===============================================================================
Install 4 Packages
Total download size: 2.5 M
Installed size: 7.6 M
Operation aborted.
exa is not yet available seems because still not in compose, but should be
there within few days (next compose).
On a related note: why is "exa" called
"rust-exa"? The "rust-" prefix seems
uncessary, for executables, since from the user's POV the implementation
language is just an implementation detail. For libraries it'd be different.
Same situation occurs with python programs, and the guidelines do _not_
prescribe python-dnf, but just dnf, etc. Is there any chance we could
drop the "rust-" prefix from user programs?
We have "rust-" prefix for all packages coming from crates.io because people
can easily turn their packages to contain library too which would be kinda
inconsistent without renaming whole package to contain prefix.
But the good thing is that even sourcerpm is called `rust-exa`, binary rpm is
named `exa`, so users will always do `dnf install exa` and it will work for
them (and it will install `exa`, not `rust-exa` package).
I hope this makes sense. If not, we would be happy to discuss it. Just open a
ticket:
https://pagure.io/fedora-rust/sig
Zbyszek
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=OYzd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----