Le 05/12/2014 11:07, Peter Palaga a écrit :
On 2014-12-05 10:24, Thomas Segismont wrote:
> Le 04/12/2014 21:54, Heiko W.Rupp a écrit :
>>
>>> Am 04.12.2014 um 19:08 schrieb Peter Palaga <ppalaga(a)redhat.com>:
>>> we have both adoc, and md READMEs in metrics ATM. Is anybody against
>>> preferring adoc and converting all present md files to adoc?
>>
>> No and we should use AsciiDoc(tor) only.
>>
>
> I'd like to agree ... :)
>
> But the Github support of Asciidoc is not extensive. I wrote a quite
> long README.adoc file for the netty-collectd project,
Yeah, as I just checked on GitHub, they still use AsciiDoctor 0.1.4,
which is quite outdated. I'd be OK with tolerating MD till GitHub
Thanks, you're so kind :)
upgrades their AsciiDoctor, but anyway: do you see a feature
commonly
used in READMEs, that is broken on GitHub now? READMEs tend to be quite
simple, do they not?
I like anchors and links to them, that was one of the things totally
broken with Github's asciidoc