Indeed. I have no other concerns. -- P
We didn't have any "default" mocking lib for RHQ,
AFAIK. I do prefer
Mockito other alternatives.
Le 02/12/2014 10:27, Peter Palaga a écrit :
> Hi *, I see mockito [1] (among others) in assertj deps. Is hereby
> Mockito becoming our preferred mock lib? -- P
>
> [1]
>
https://github.com/joel-costigliola/assertj-core/blob/master/pom.xml#L36
>
> On 2014-12-02 10:09, Thomas Segismont wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Last week I submitted a PR "Rest test: don't rebuild rest war over and
>> over again when Arquillian @Deployment method is executed" [1]
>>
>> As part of the changes, I added a new test dependency to assertj [2]
>>
>> Before the PR can be merged, do you all agree to use this? It's only a
>> test dependency.
>>
>> Here's what I like:
>>
>> * write assertThat(testedObject) and then use code completion to find
>> the method you need
>>
>> * nice fluent API
>>
>> ```
>> WebArchive[] webArchives = ...;
>> assertThat(webArchives).isNotNull().isNotEmpty().hasSize(1);
>> ```
>>
>> This reads much better IMO that the equivalent with base
>> assertNull/assertFalse/assertEquals
>>
>>
>> There's a good descriptions of features on the project site [2].
>>
>> Regards,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> [1]
https://github.com/rhq-project/rhq-metrics/pull/72
>> [2]
>>
http://joel-costigliola.github.io/assertj/assertj-core-features-highlight...
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rhq-devel mailing list
>> rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
_______________________________________________
rhq-devel mailing list
rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel