We use it extensively, since we run it in a multi node HA mode. RHQ/JON
for very large systems should present the system as a large, single system
image. Ability to seamlessly use a load balancing proxy, like
Apache/modJK helps in this regard. Adds a great deal to rapid scalability
as we add more management server nodes to keep up with the exploding pace
of our virtualized Java hosts.
David Webster
Union Pacific Railroad
Lead Architect-Systems Engineering
Phone: (402) 544-1094 | Email: dawebster(a)up.com
From: Andreas Dietrich <adi(a)aspicon.de>
To: rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Date: 07/23/2012 02:01 AM
Subject: Re: supporting proxies in front of RHQ
Sent by: rhq-devel-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Hi,
we are using it for the RHQ Server GUI so we only have to type "rhq" in
the browser address bar to go there. Is this what you mean or do you
mean other HTTP communication interfaces?
Regards
Andreas
On 07/17/2012 05:22 PM, Charles Crouch wrote:
Quick straw poll:
1) How many people are using http proxy server in front of RHQ?
2) How many people would benefit from using such a setup?
Thanks
Charles
_______________________________________________
rhq-devel mailing list
rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
_______________________________________________
rhq-devel mailing list
rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
**
This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or
privileged for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any use, review, disclosure,
copying, distribution or reliance by others, and any forwarding of this email or its
contents, without the express permission of the sender is strictly prohibited by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately, delete the
e-mail and destroy all copies.
**