Hi Thomas,
I like PingService. It's main purpose is to do simple monitoring of
machines/devices that do not run agent itself. I'd like to use it to
monitor my network (I am an small internet provider). My network has some
topology - one device's availability depends on another device's
availability. My usecase would be adding all 200 PingService resources on
1 platform that would do 'the monitoring' and setup availability alert on
them. But, if one important device goes down, all dependent devices goes
down as well - So I might get hundreds of emails. My suggestion is, to be
able to add PingService child resource to PingService resource and explain
network hierarchy this way. If any important device goes down, I should
get 1 alert, and child devices would go to 'UNKNOWN' state.
What do you guys think?
Would that be useful for anyone?
Does it break concept of Platform->Server->Service resource hierarchy?
Thanks
Dne Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:50:13 +0100 Thomas Segismont <tsegismo(a)redhat.com>
napsal(a):
Hi,
I've wrote a blog post on the recent Net Services plugin enhancements[1]:
* some HTTP service features were not fully implemented;
* the new Port service lets you monitor a remote port for TCP connection
* the plugin now has tests and integration tests for all its services
Cheers
Thomas
[1]
http://tsegismont.blogspot.fr/2013/03/rhq-net-services-plugin-enhancement...
_______________________________________________
rhq-devel mailing list
rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
--
Libor Zoubek
JBoss ON QE