Will this have an impact on the maven parent module name?
Well, we should rename the artifactId, name and description in the pom.xml as well to be
consistent, but the packaging is set to pom (no jar/war) so there is no useful file except
the pom file in its the target dir. This file is copied to the ~/.m2/ repo, but nothing
really depends on this artifact. The parent poms are there just to group together another
artifacts.
Also I'd refrain from doing that until we release JON. It'd
make cherry-picking stuff to the release branch a royal pain.
agree
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Segismont" <tsegismo(a)redhat.com>
> To: rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2013 3:10:46 PM
> Subject: Re: mv modules/enterprise/gui modules/enterprise/war
>
Will this have an impact on the maven parent module name?
>
> Le 07/11/2013 13:29, Jiri Kremser a écrit :
> > Hi devs,
> > looking into modules/enterprise/gui directory, there are only wars
> > present:
> >
> > $ls modules/enterprise/gui
> > agentupdate-war content_http-war downloads-war portal-war
> > remoting-war rest-war target
> > client-war coregui pom.xml remote-client-war
> > rest-examples-war rhq-enterprise-gui-parent.iml
> >
> > What about renaming the somewhat confusing name 'gui' to more
appropriate
> > name 'war'? I believe historically it made sense to call it gui, but
once
> > there are wars with rest and other non-gui stuff, I guess it is time to
> > change.
> >
> > jk
> > _______________________________________________
> > rhq-devel mailing list
> > rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> >
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
>