That's an interesting point. You should have a look at how this is done e.g. in SPC (statistical proccess control) tools that are standard e.g. in the manufacturing industry and have a very similar use case:
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_process_control)
The six sigma control charts are common in the chip or solar industry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_sigma
E.g. such control charts would be appropriate ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_chart#Chart_details ... to - see control limits (warning and critical limits) - see critical values (also their state ... acknowledged or not ... e.g. bold red or thin red marks) - comment on critical values or ranges (acknowledgement)
But again ... I would see this as a low prio feature since we (RHQ users) are all aware of the alerts that matter and are setup. The charts would not really improve our use cases.
On 11/10/2010 10:52 AM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
This brings me to an idea:
Am 10.11.2010 um 10:46 schrieb Andreas Dietrich:
and resource limitations or are recognized by alerts that "watch" those time-based developments for me in the background (and they are purists
If there are alerts defined (not applicable for all types), we could draw small dotted lines in the graphs that show the alerting conditions.
rhq-devel mailing list rhq-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel