On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 10:32 -0700, David Lutterkort wrote:
> It does seem to be quite common to have:
>
> <vm href=".../vms/{id}">
> ...
> </vm>
>
> but bburke advocates the Atom link style>
>
> <vm>
> <link rel="self" href=".../vms/{id}/"
type="application/xml"/>
> </vm>
>
> Since we're likely to use <link>s for e.g. actions, I think it makes
> sense to use it in this case too
Is there a reason given for the latter ? It seems unnecessarily
verbose to me.
The ability to express relationships, consistency with the Link: header
and it's usefulness for e.g <action> groups, I guess
Cheers,
Mark.