On 06/27/2013 10:11 AM, Jan Safranek wrote:
On 06/25/2013 04:56 PM, Jan Safranek wrote:
> Alternatively, we can create libpyCmpiLMI_Software.so and
> libpyCmpiLMI_Storage.so as symlinks to libpyCmpiProvider.so. In this
> case, we just need to change our registration files and package the new
> symlinks. Is it acceptable solution?
If there are no objections, I'll add attached README.SELinux to
cmpi-providers-pywbem.rpm and implement suggested adjustments in next
release of openlmi-storage.rpm.
All changes are Fedora downstream only, upstream is not affected.
Argh, scratch all this, I had misconfigured Pegasus. Pegasus passes
PG_ProviderModule.ModuleGroupName to cimprovagt, which is different for
OpenLMI storage and software providers, therefore no magic symlinks are
needed.
Jan