On 06/17/2013 04:28 PM, Radek Novacek wrote:
> >The way I've been thinking about this is that this kind
of domain
> >knowledge could be encoded into those CIM models rather than into the
> >generic PCP bridge. For example, would it be possible for the OpenLMI
> >IPNetworkConnection code to redirect some statistics inquiries to the
> >PCP_Metric_XXX it knows about.
This sound reasonable, however we won't be following the CIM modeling. For
network statistics there is standard CIM class CIM_EthernetPortStatistics [1]
that provides compatible access to network port statistics.
If we use PCP bridge directly we're going to lose object-level compatibility
with CIM schema. I don't know how much do we care about it. tsmetana, jsafrane
- what do you think?
It could be doable as enhancement and it shouldn't brake
any
compatibility. But I'm not sure if it has any gain.
RR