On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:13 -0600, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
If my suspicion is correct, then the "ease of use" of
olpc-update (which
depends upon /versions) needs to be balanced against the potential for
"shock" if the XO-1 user "runs out of room in the XO1" that much
sooner.
I'm afraid that olpc-update will never become usable in the general
case. I find it hard to believe that users will be willing to sacrifice
~500MB of their flash to accommodate updates. In the field, it's a lot
faster to flash a new image from USB and then restore the journal from
backup.
Today I found out that Esteban, a Ceibal developer, has been working on
a "backup to USB" patch for the Journal.
In Paraguay, we've been using two simple shell scripts to save and
restore the journal across upgrades, but a proper UI would definitely
simplify things for the technicians.
--
// Bernie Innocenti -
http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs -
http://sugarlabs.org/