On 25 January 2011 21:42, Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Daniel, list,
what's the status of this?
I'll probably jump back on it after clearing out some more immediate projects.
I need to generate discussion around this to verify that I'm not
missing anything, but I had a thought that solves the crypto problem:
The auditing is only relevant for signature verification code,
therefore these tools could use the unaudited system libraries without
worry.
Daniel