mock wrangling
by Daniel Drake
Hi,
I need to rebuild the olpc-update package for OLPC's 8.2.1 release and
mock is being a headache.
The code is at git://dev.laptop.org/projects/olpc-update
"make mock" is the command to build it.
You need this mock cfg in /etc/mock:
http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/olpc-3-i386.cfg
It first runs this command:
mock -r olpc-3-i386 --resultdir=./rpms -q --init
The error is this:
DEBUG: python-devel-2.5.1-25.fc9.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
DEBUG: --> Missing Dependency: python = 2.5.1-25.fc9 is needed by
package python-devel-2.5.1-25.fc9.i386 (fedora)
DEBUG: Error: Missing Dependency: python = 2.5.1-25.fc9 is needed by
package python-devel-2.5.1-25.fc9.i386 (fedora)
Full logs:
http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20090219/mockerror.txt
Any hints or debugging tips? I'm not sure where to start. I already
removed /var/lib/mock/* and ran "yum clean" but I don't think I have
wiped all caches (it still runs into this error quickly, whereas I
would expect it to spend 30 secs or so downloading the package
databases before deciding which versions of python are and are not
available). And incomplete/bad caches might not even be the problem.
Thanks!
Daniel
15 years, 3 months
No meeting today
by Greg DeKoenigsberg
Unfortunately, I have personal business to attend to. Next meeting:
February 26th. The agenda, as it will be until the answer is yes: do we
have a rawhide build that boots on the XO?
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
15 years, 3 months
Help debug latest rawhide images
by Greg DeKoenigsberg
In lieu of an actual meeting... Chris Ball will be publishing the url for
a rawhide-based iso image suitable for burning to USB key later today.
Everyone with XOs: *please* burn and try to boot from USB using this
image. Help us debug boot failures, either on-list or in #fedora-olpc.
This is pretty much the critical path. Help if you can.
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
15 years, 3 months
New developer
by Benjamin Kreuter
Hi everyone --
I am a new OLPC/XO developer. Is there a list of pressing issues that need to
be addressed, or should I just find something interesting that needs work? I
have an XO in my possession at the moment, so I can work on issues that might
require that.
-- Ben
--
Message sent on: Sat Feb 14 14:18:56 EST 2009
15 years, 3 months
Re: buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on log-activity-Fedora10
by David Farning
On a related note:
Would it be reasonable to ask
"Sascha Silbe" <sascha-ml-reply-to-2008-4(a)silbe.org>,
to maintain sugar-jhbuild?
I don't know him very well yet, but he has been contributing a steady
stream of depschecks bugs:)
We could give offer him commit access to sugar-jhbuild and or/a login
to buildmaster(a)sunjammer.sugarlabs.org
Sascha, please note this is a common problem with open source
projects. If you show competency, you are at risk of being asked to
assume authority and responsibility for something:)
Anyone else interested in helping maintain the Sugar Labs build farm?
It is almost identical to Gnome's infrastructure.
...and a good introduction to the infrastructure team. And let's face
it, the various Sugar Labs services are starting to get on the order
or 1000's of hits per day. That doesn't look bad on a resume.
...and bernie has been a pretty good teacher:)
david
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu(a)sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> Ok. Breakers and fixers of sugar-jhbuild: please ping me whenever you
> need buildbot restarted.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tomeu
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 15:14, David Farning <dfarning(a)sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>> #ssh sunjammer.sugarlabs.org
>> #sudo su - buildmaster
>> #cd sugar-jhbuild
>> #cat twisted.pid
>> #kill ???
>> #./sugar-jhbuild bot --start-server --daemon
>>
>> david
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu(a)sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 21:02, David Farning <dfarning(a)sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Simon Schampijer <simon(a)schampijer.de> wrote:
>>>>> buildbot(a)sugarlabs.org wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of log-activity-Fedora10 on Sugar
>>>>>> Labs Buildbot.
>>>>>> Full details are available at:
>>>>>> http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/log-activity-Fedora10/builds/73
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD
>>>>>> Blamelist:
>>>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed log-activity update
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sincerely,
>>>>>> -The Buildbot
>>>>>
>>>>> I update the git url for Log to point to the sugarlabs repository - i guess
>>>>> that is not picked up by jhbuild automatically :/
>>>>>
>>>> After an update to jhbuild, it currently needs to be restarted
>>>> manually. When our infrastructure guys get time, I have have asked
>>>> them to add a commit hook to git.sl.org That will allow us to take
>>>> the correct action on commits. That is post .86 in terms of priority.
>>>>
>>>> tomeu, Do you have access to restart the buildmaster on sunjammer?
>>>
>>> Yes, how can I do that?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Tomeu
>>>
>>
>
15 years, 3 months
Re: buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on log-activity-Fedora10
by David Farning
#ssh sunjammer.sugarlabs.org
#sudo su - buildmaster
#cd sugar-jhbuild
#cat twisted.pid
#kill ???
#./sugar-jhbuild bot --start-server --daemon
david
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu(a)sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 21:02, David Farning <dfarning(a)sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Simon Schampijer <simon(a)schampijer.de> wrote:
>>> buildbot(a)sugarlabs.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of log-activity-Fedora10 on Sugar
>>>> Labs Buildbot.
>>>> Full details are available at:
>>>> http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/log-activity-Fedora10/builds/73
>>>>
>>>> Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/
>>>>
>>>> Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10
>>>>
>>>> Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD
>>>> Blamelist:
>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed log-activity update
>>>>
>>>> sincerely,
>>>> -The Buildbot
>>>
>>> I update the git url for Log to point to the sugarlabs repository - i guess
>>> that is not picked up by jhbuild automatically :/
>>>
>> After an update to jhbuild, it currently needs to be restarted
>> manually. When our infrastructure guys get time, I have have asked
>> them to add a commit hook to git.sl.org That will allow us to take
>> the correct action on commits. That is post .86 in terms of priority.
>>
>> tomeu, Do you have access to restart the buildmaster on sunjammer?
>
> Yes, how can I do that?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tomeu
>
15 years, 3 months
EdTechDay - Ithaca College (Upstate NY)
by Karlie Robinson
Good morning everyone.
This came to my attention late but I am going to call tomorrow and see
if there's any presentation slots available.
I'd like to present the XO and the work that Fedora/OLPC (and
On-Disk.com) do to further the educational needs of children everywhere.
I'll keep you updated as I have information about my very late
registration.
~Karlie
15 years, 3 months