On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:25:58AM +0600, Rashadul Islam wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Bruno Wolff III
<bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:37:42 -0400,
> "Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is an odd use of <ref> as a replacement for bullet lists. A
> > <ref> usually means a footnote that adds to other text. Here's the
> > results that come out in one of our test pages when there's an
> > "unattached" <ref> or footnote (look for numbers 21 and up):
>
> They work odd as well. Clicking on the link in the description brings
> you to the real link in the footnote area (more or less) and then you
> have to click on that link to get to the actual web page.
> _______________________________________________
> news mailing list
> news(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/news
>
I am just confused with the examples. Please get me out of my confusion:
1. We should write the link straight as "star followed by the hyperlink"
*
http://url1.com
*
http://url2.com
Yes, this is the form you would use if the purpose of the list is
simply to list URLs by themselves.
or
2. Just the below: "star followed by the text and use
<ref>.....</ref>"
* The Fedora Insight system<ref>http://url3.com</ref>
Yes, this is the form you would use if the purpose of the list is to
list text, where the text has a reference to a URL.
or All the above? If yes, then when we should use each of them.
Hope the above guidance helps.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies:
http://opensource.com