On 09/27/2010 08:40 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:25:58AM +0600, Rashadul Islam wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Bruno Wolff III<bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:37:42 -0400,
>> "Paul W. Frields"<stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This is an odd use of<ref> as a replacement for bullet lists. A
>>> <ref> usually means a footnote that adds to other text. Here's
the
>>> results that come out in one of our test pages when there's an
>>> "unattached"<ref> or footnote (look for numbers 21 and up):
>> They work odd as well. Clicking on the link in the description brings
>> you to the real link in the footnote area (more or less) and then you
>> have to click on that link to get to the actual web page.
>> _______________________________________________
>> news mailing list
>> news(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/news
>>
> I am just confused with the examples. Please get me out of my confusion:
>
> 1. We should write the link straight as "star followed by the hyperlink"
>
> *
http://url1.com
> *
http://url2.com
Yes, this is the form you would use if the purpose of the list is
simply to list URLs by themselves.
> or
>
>
> 2. Just the below: "star followed by the text and
use<ref>.....</ref>"
> * The Fedora Insight system<ref>http://url3.com</ref>
Yes, this is the form you would use if the purpose of the list is to
list text, where the text has a reference to a URL.
> or All the above? If yes, then when we should use each of them.
Hope the above guidance helps.
Thanks Paul and Rashadul! I think these examples
illustrate the use
cases very clearly.
Paul, I will watch out for list URLs in upcoming beats and change as
necessary. I'll also carve out some time today to update the workflow
page for beats accordingly.
- pascal