Kevin Kofler wrote:
> But we did come up with a coherent plan for how to do this:
>
>
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-February/00046...
>
> (see also the following messages).
That sounds like a bad plan. The targets don't have any more in common than
they do with the native version. It makes sense to keep them in separate SRPMs
for the same reason it makes sense to keep them separate from the native
package.
I don't see a problem with building mingw64-* from mingw32-* SRPMs or the
opposite, as that's the same target OS, just on different hardware platforms,
but building darwinx-* from the same SRPM as mingw* sounds very artificial to
me. They're likely to need different patches, dependencies etc.
why maintain 3 spec file for eg mingw32-zlib which are exactly identical
on all platform or even a for cycle would be enough in the build
section. it keeps simple clean and easier to maintain these even now too
much packages.
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"