On 30 Aug 2011, at 8:40 PM, Perry Myers wrote:
On 08/30/2011 02:01 PM, Steven Dake wrote:
>
http://burrow.openstack.org/overview.html
I'll provide a little context, so that people just seeing an email with
a link will have some reason/incentive to click on said link.
Openstack has apparently made a conscious decision to not use AMQP as
part of it's architecture, and went and developed this new project
called burrow.
So it would be interesting to see what their issues with AMQP were,
whether or not they apply to us, and whether or not their implementation
makes any sense in our context.
With apologies to Philip Greenspun:
"Any sufficiently complicated distributed network application contains an ad hoc,
informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Erlang."
If C++ intimidates them and they don't need the light footprint of the Apache
implementation they could always have used rabbitmq.
- antoine