On 08/19/2011 03:30 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 18/08/11 17:44, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 08/18/2011 10:42 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>> [Moving this discussion to the Matahari list]
>>
>> On 18/08/11 14:22, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>>
>>> One thing to note from the guidelines that we haven't been doing is
>>> including the Acked-by and Reported-by tags. I would still like to use
>>> those, but it's obviously open for discussion.
>>
>> The traditional way that this works is that the person doing the Ack-ing
>> adds Acked-by and pushes the patch upstream themselves. I like having it
>> there, but the tools don't make it as easy as I'd like it to be with our
>> current workflow.
>
> Well it's just as much work for the person doing the acking to add it as
> it would be for the original author, right? It's overhead either way,
> but is it worth it?
>
Nope, actually "stg edit --ack" is a *lot* easier, and it doesn't
require me to spell anyone's name or email address correctly, including
my own ;)
Ok, well I don't feel that strongly about it so let's just remove it
from the guidelines for now. I'll take care of that.
--
Russell Bryant