On 06/07/11 03:48, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 6/07/11 6:08 AM, Perry Myers wrote:
> On 07/05/2011 03:39 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Perry Myers<pmyers(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> beekhof, stokes, zaneb, russellb, what do you guys want to do?
>>>
>>> Options are:
>>> 1) github issues w/ sync script
>>> 2) Community->Matahari with components broken out by functional area
>>> 3) Community->Matahari with a single component (matahari)
>>
>> My vote is #2. I don't imagine that it's much more work than #3 and
>> could prove valuable at some point in the future if we want to do some
>> data mining on issue history. If there's something about bugzilla
>> that makes #2 a sizable amount more work for some reason, #3 is fine
>> too.
Also agree on #2
Since the consensus seems to be that it's between #2 & #3, I'll cast my
vote for #3. Everybody always thinks that one day they'll do data
mining. Nobody ever does. In the meantime it's just a bunch of extra
work (that tends to grow over time as people think of new things they
might one day want to data mine). This is not a big project. If we are
going to have multiple components I'd limit it to 2:
* matahari core
* matahari agents
My 2c ;)
(btw. is this coming out as plain text? hard to tell with the new
thunderbird)
Yes.
cheers,
Zane.