On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:45 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was talking recently to a couple of friends who aren't in the software
> industry and it came out in our recent discussions that both the
> companies they are working for is using Fedora on their systems. They
> remarked that they had no idea that Red Hat was involved in Fedora.
>
> I still meet people in various places who think Red Hat has stopped
> working on a free distribution after Red Hat Linux 9 and continue to use
> it or worse a earlier version.
>
People don't know about Linux. People don't know (or don't care) about
Free and Open Source Software in general. Or open document standards for
that matter. Even more people do not know EPEL. I've seen experienced
administrators not knowing perl-LDAP is actually a package and it
doesn't need to come from CPAN.
Long story short; people just can't keep track. Some people will miss
out on huge changes. Ask people to explain global warming. Ignorance is
bliss. And not our problem.
> I just looked within Fedora to see if there was any hint and couldn't
> really find any prominent ones. The note on
http://fedoraproject.org is
> also easily missed. Is this a deliberate decision? Should there be some
> of co-branding within the distribution and a prominent hint in other
> places?
>
> Something like Fedora - Powered by Red Hat/ Sponsored by Red Hat or some
> such.
>
A *huge* -1 here
We've already spend lots of effort getting rid of the widely spread
prejudice of being Red Hat's pre-enterprise private little playground
project or distribution, and explaining that we're actually a community
powered project instead (Yes, sponsored by Red Hat. Yes, upstream to Red
Hat's Enterprise Linux product *and proud of it, might I add*).
I'm not even sure we actually did get rid of that prejudice entirely. It
may still exist in some people's heads.
Anyway, correctly and fully exposing how Fedora is related to Red Hat,
and how that works for both the community and Red Hat, with mere mortals
on the one side, and business customers on the other, is way more
important then getting the long-term users back on board because they
missed out on Red Hat renaming the free/gratis distribution to Fedora,
making Red Hat their Enterprise product.
Honestly, I don't think it's our problem someone missed out on all this
back in the day. If they're really interested / valuable as
contributors, it'll come naturally. If not, it'll still come naturally
with the work of our Ambassadors and thanks to other exposure.
In a thread on fedora-ambassadors-list[1], someone was kind enough to
raise an exception from our own Greg DeKoenigsberg:
"The Fedora brand must evolve separately from Red Hat's brand. Fedora is
very important to Red Hat, but Fedora is not Red Hat. It's really
crucial to understand that distinction."
-1 to co-branding.
= = = = =
[1]
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/2008-March/msg0018...
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug