Actually, if we define Fedora as a true meritocracy, we will be able
to establish the leaders of the project this way.
a
On 2/28/06, Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Article about mapping informal relationships in an organization:
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_09/b3973083.htm
I think it would help us _a_lot_ if we had some mapping of how stuff
gets done in Fedora. This is from a survey, where you ask people who
they go to for information, who comes to them, and what kind of
information they share.
Some social risks are involved, but it's worth a look.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer *
http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Content Services Fedora Documentation Project
http://www.redhat.com/docs http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBEBLK92ZIOBq0ODEERAudnAKCXwFQqI7abLW4ooKMr3YD4hFlcYgCfc3fX
2KN4WKpGYI24mHFL9uWg5Ig=
=8uVP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list