--- Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 19:05 -0700, Jane Dogalt wrote:
> --- Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > The board meeting
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/Meetings/2006-04-07:
> >
> > Live CD (Kadischi) -- Lots of people like the idea of this project,
> > but there are still some problems to solve. We should empower people
> ...
> > It is now the time to discuss and share thoughts about how shall we
> > boost Kadischi :)
>
> 2) unionfs via initramfs (forget read-only root)
Since unionfs isn't in the Fedora kernels, it's not really something we
can count on right now. And there are significant concerns about it
from some of our kernel developers that are likely to keep it from being
a good option.
Can you enumerate at least a couple of those concerns? I see huge advantages,
which have caused several livecd projects to already utilize it. I don't mind
kadischi opting not to use unionfs, but I would like to know why.
As far as not being in the kernels, it does build just fine as a module outside
of the kernel.
-jdog
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com