latrace: plans for supporting debug symbols ?
by Yann Dirson
Hello,
latrace is currently cool for simple programs that use just libc or
some lib small enough to make (re)writing a header file reasonable. I
was looking forward to using it to investigate the interactions
between a Qt program and the Qt libs - you will understand I don't
intend to write (C-style) headers for (even a usable subset of) Qt :)
Luckily, it seems that in many cases all the necessary information is
available as debug symbols (eg. in Debian most libs, while shipped
without debug symbols, have a companion package shipping separate
debug symbols, which gcc knows how to use).
Are there any plans to access those debug symbols (through libbfd
maybe ?) in latrace ?
Best regards,
--
Yann
11 years, 11 months
asciidoc required?
by ohav chochmah
Hello,
when asciidoc is not on the system, latrace building / installing fails in
the following steps:
ASCIIDOC doc/latrace.1
XMLTO doc/latrace.1
Input file /tmp/pacaurtmp-sm/latrace/src/latrace-0.5.11/doc/latrace.xml not
found
make: *** [doc/latrace.1] Error 1
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
Aborting...
at the very least, it should fail at ASCIIDOC stage, not at the XMLTO one...
cheers.
11 years, 11 months