On 10/26/16 at 10:50am, Pratyush Anand wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Tuesday 25 October 2016 07:53 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> Moreover, with above additional two patches kexec-tools seems fine, but
> still fedora-kernel-arm64/devel (with fh_defconfig+kexec enabled) did
> not reboot on a seattle platform (Nothing after "Bye"). Will debug and
> come back on it.
So couple of observation and so some queries:
(a) Proposed kexec-tools patch with suggested additional patches works, but
not with [1]. However, same kexec-tools did work when I used kernel from [2]
which is based on 4.9-rc2. What is the kernel version that will be released
in fc25? and which platform are you targeting? I can try to see the
necessary diff which might cause the issue on mustang/seattle. Issue might
not be related directly to kexec, and might be plat specific.
(b) With current proposed kexec-tools, it takes more than 3 min to verify
sha on seattle machine. If you want to do it quick (in a second) then you
might need some more kexec-tools patches which are not yet approved in
upstream. They are these [3].
Pratyush, I think for (b) we can just live with it, it maybe seattle
specific issues.
>
>
> ~Pratyush
>
> [1]
https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/kernel-arm64.git : devel (or master)
>
> [2]
https://github.com/pratyushanand/linux/tree/upstream_arm64_devel
>
> [3]
https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/182706c9dd2e78d727343...
>
https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/87d642cd983e68a2ca3c6...
>
https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/a9473f1124d35f5144a5b...
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list -- kexec(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kexec-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org