On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:24 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I found the systemd scripts from the gateway image. They are very
well commented so they will be easy to use.
The only question is have is what user to have these run as?
Should we add a new user? Or use one of the standard ones?
Either way, we'll have to make sure we have that user available, using
the standard fedora rpm techniques for doing that.
I think we should create a new one, the packaging guidelines should
have the details for that
P
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:19 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > I agree.
> > If you use the gateway rpi images, it automatically starts. I'll look
> > into how they do that, and if it's systemd based, I'll see about
> > getting the files.
> > I'd feel better if the files are coming from the group, so they can be
tracked.
> >
> > Troy
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Jared K. Smith <jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for doing the hard work of packaging this up... things are looking
pretty good. I'll continue to work on the package review in the Bugzilla ticket.
> > >
> > > One question I had was regarding the gateway software itself -- I think we
probably need some sort of systemd initscript to start and stop the software, and some
sort of instructions for people to get started. Thoughts?
> > >
> > > -Jared
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:14 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Fedora Review Requests:
> > >> * mozilla-iot-gateway
> > >>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
> > >> * nodejs-nanomsg
> > >>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
> > >>
> > >> Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd appreciate it.
> > >> Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd appreciate someone who
> > >> knows about bundling working on it.
> > >> nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs package. But
it's
> > >> needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain noarch.
> > >>
> > >> Troy
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson
<pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If they look
good
> > >> >
> > >> > I will do in in the next few days.
> > >> >
> > >> > > I'll work on getting them into Fedora, hopefully in time
for F30
> > >> > > freeze.
> > >> >
> > >> > I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner than that to
> > >> > enable wider testing by interested parties. It's going to take
time to
> > >> > do things like license review so the sooner we can get the spec up
for
> > >> > review it will start to enable these things more formally. I
don't
> > >> > expect the first version that lands in the repos proper to be
perfect
> > >> > but it does enable easier testing by a wider audience and release
> > >> > early release often etc.
> > >> >
> > >> > While obviously there's still work to be done I think it's
in good
> > >> > enough shape to get the package review submitted and in motion.
> > >> >
> > >> > Peter
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I believe I have this working now.
> > >> > > > I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines and it
works great.
> > >> > > > I'm having some problems installing in on aarch64
(raspberry pi 3)
> > >> > > > machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting
scripts.
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Troy
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Two things:
> > >> > > > > 1 - I'm calling the package
mozilla-iot-gateway
> > >> > > > > -- The reason for my final decision is that
everything gets saved in
> > >> > > > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in
it's documentation
> > >> > > > > refering to it as things-gateway, other than that
one webpage.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > 2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for
over 400 modules, I
> > >> > > > > just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our
nodejs modules are very
> > >> > > > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things
like that. I'm
> > >> > > > > going back to my original design of only unbundling
the binary (arch
> > >> > > > > dependent) modules.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I should have a workable package tomorrow.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Troy
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty
<rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson
wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > Next release of "gateway" is
up, along with a corresponding updated
> > >> > > > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> > >> > > > > > > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M
and built rpm[2] by
> > >> > > > > > > 20M. Ya!!
> > >> > > > > > > The spec file [3] has an updated license
list with all the licenses
> > >> > > > > > > from the bundled modules. Oddly enough,
I didn't find a single GPL,
> > >> > > > > > > though there was one LGPL.
> > >> > > > > > > It also has all the unbundled packages
now as Requires, and all the
> > >> > > > > > > bundled packages as Provides: bundled().
Thus making the spec file
> > >> > > > > > > rather long.
> > >> > > > > > > I also went through and trimmed out all
the cruft that didn't need to
> > >> > > > > > > be installed for gateway to run
(.travis.yml, .babelrc, and others)
> > >> > > > > > > I also added how to run it as a regular
user in the %description
> > >> > > > > > > area.
> > >> > > > > > > That's probrubly not the best place
to put that, but I figured it's a
> > >> > > > > > > place a user can always see.
> > >> > > > > > > The script[4] to download, setup, trim
and tar up the source with
> > >> > > > > > > it's
> > >> > > > > > > dependencies has been updated to use an
external file, that is a list
> > >> > > > > > > of all the nodejs modules to pull out of
the bundled
> > >> > > > > > > dependencies. It
> > >> > > > > > > also now goes as deep as it needs to in
order to pull out all those
> > >> > > > > > > modules.
> > >> > > > > > > And there is the list of modules we are
unbundeling.[5]
> > >> > > > > > > Here is where everything is. [6]
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > These have been tested on aarch64
(rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > I haven't decided between
things-gateway and mozilla-iot-gateway.
> > >> > > > > > Have you considered
mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Both have good reasons to be the right
name. Honestly, I might just
> > >> > > > > > > flip a coin and let that decide.
> > >> > > > > > > If anyone has a strong preference for one
or the other, let me know.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Troy
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > [1] -
> > >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > >> > > > > > > [2] -
> > >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > >> > > > > > > [3] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > >> > > > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > >> > > > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > >> > > > > > > [6] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K.
Smith <
> > >> > > > > > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy
Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > Here's a fun fact.
> > >> > > > > > > > > gateway depends on 1000
node_modules (exactly I believe)
> > >> > > > > > > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of
those packages. Ya!!
> > >> > > > > > > > > Of course, that means that I
have to have 455 lines of
> > >> > > > > > > > > "Requires:" and
> > >> > > > > > > > > 545 lines of "Provides:
bundled()" in the spec file
> > >> > > > > > > > > Ya!!??
> > >> > > > > > > > > This spec file just went from a
lightweight to a sumo wrestler in
> > >> > > > > > > > > one day.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > That's the NodeJS way,
unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG was
> > >> > > > > > > > working on a macro to automagically
create the "Provides:
> > >> > > > > > > > bundled()" lines, but I really
don't know if they ever got it
> > >> > > > > > > > working.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > -Jared
> > >> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > >> > > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > >> > > > > > > List Guidelines:
> > >> > > > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > >> > > > > > > List Archives:
> > >> > > > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > >> > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > >> > > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > >> > > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > >> > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > >> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > >> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > >> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org