On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 1:02 PM Tim Coote <tim+fedoraproject.org(a)coote.org>
wrote:
In the case of podman they often will rebase to newer major versions
in f29 when they consider them stable. You don't mention the version number, exact
details tend to be useful in this context.
Sorry, half asleep: issue here:
http://bit.ly/2DyS8B8
<
https://u8538325.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=YKnOrpjBkiBX5bFl4-2BXAlP8Q5...;.
failed for me with `podman version 0.10.1.3`, worked with
`podman-0.11.1-1.gita4adfe5.fc29.x86_64` (for libpod folks), and
`podman-0.11.2-4.dev.gitea928f2.fc30.x86_64`, from rawhide for me.
Validated on x86 based systems, so I was quite keen to confirm that it
worked on aarch64, as, afaict, the failures that I had with the early
version differed on the two h/w architectures.
It's in f29 updates-testing but it's broken in various ways so I doubt
it'll land stable until the issues are resolved.