I agree.
If you use the gateway rpi images, it automatically starts. I'll look
into how they do that, and if it's systemd based, I'll see about
getting the files.
I'd feel better if the files are coming from the group, so they can be tracked.
Troy
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Jared K. Smith <jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing the hard work of packaging this up... things are looking pretty
good. I'll continue to work on the package review in the Bugzilla ticket.
>
> One question I had was regarding the gateway software itself -- I think we probably
need some sort of systemd initscript to start and stop the software, and some sort of
instructions for people to get started. Thoughts?
>
> -Jared
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:14 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Fedora Review Requests:
>> * mozilla-iot-gateway
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
>> * nodejs-nanomsg
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
>>
>> Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd appreciate it.
>> Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd appreciate someone who
>> knows about bundling working on it.
>> nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs package. But it's
>> needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain noarch.
>>
>> Troy
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >
>> > > Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If they look good
>> >
>> > I will do in in the next few days.
>> >
>> > > I'll work on getting them into Fedora, hopefully in time for F30
>> > > freeze.
>> >
>> > I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner than that to
>> > enable wider testing by interested parties. It's going to take time to
>> > do things like license review so the sooner we can get the spec up for
>> > review it will start to enable these things more formally. I don't
>> > expect the first version that lands in the repos proper to be perfect
>> > but it does enable easier testing by a wider audience and release
>> > early release often etc.
>> >
>> > While obviously there's still work to be done I think it's in good
>> > enough shape to get the package review submitted and in motion.
>> >
>> > Peter
>> >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > I believe I have this working now.
>> > > > I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines and it works
great.
>> > > > I'm having some problems installing in on aarch64 (raspberry
pi 3)
>> > > > machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
>> > > >
>> > > > Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting scripts.
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
>> > > >
>> > > > Troy
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Two things:
>> > > > > 1 - I'm calling the package mozilla-iot-gateway
>> > > > > -- The reason for my final decision is that everything gets
saved in
>> > > > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in it's
documentation
>> > > > > refering to it as things-gateway, other than that one
webpage.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for over 400
modules, I
>> > > > > just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our nodejs modules
are very
>> > > > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things like that.
I'm
>> > > > > going back to my original design of only unbundling the
binary (arch
>> > > > > dependent) modules.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I should have a workable package tomorrow.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Troy
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty
<rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
>> > > > > > > Next release of "gateway" is up, along
with a corresponding updated
>> > > > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
>> > > > > > > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built
rpm[2] by
>> > > > > > > 20M. Ya!!
>> > > > > > > The spec file [3] has an updated license list with
all the licenses
>> > > > > > > from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I
didn't find a single GPL,
>> > > > > > > though there was one LGPL.
>> > > > > > > It also has all the unbundled packages now as
Requires, and all the
>> > > > > > > bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus
making the spec file
>> > > > > > > rather long.
>> > > > > > > I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft
that didn't need to
>> > > > > > > be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml,
.babelrc, and others)
>> > > > > > > I also added how to run it as a regular user in the
%description
>> > > > > > > area.
>> > > > > > > That's probrubly not the best place to put
that, but I figured it's a
>> > > > > > > place a user can always see.
>> > > > > > > The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up
the source with
>> > > > > > > it's
>> > > > > > > dependencies has been updated to use an external
file, that is a list
>> > > > > > > of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the
bundled
>> > > > > > > dependencies. It
>> > > > > > > also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to
pull out all those
>> > > > > > > modules.
>> > > > > > > And there is the list of modules we are
unbundeling.[5]
>> > > > > > > Here is where everything is. [6]
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and
x86_64.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I haven't decided between things-gateway and
mozilla-iot-gateway.
>> > > > > > Have you considered mozillathings-iot-gateway?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Both have good reasons to be the right name.
Honestly, I might just
>> > > > > > > flip a coin and let that decide.
>> > > > > > > If anyone has a strong preference for one or the
other, let me know.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Troy
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > [1] -
>> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
>> > > > > > > [2] -
>> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
>> > > > > > > [3] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
>> > > > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
>> > > > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
>> > > > > > > [6] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
>> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith
<
>> > > > > > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com>
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > Here's a fun fact.
>> > > > > > > > > gateway depends on 1000 node_modules
(exactly I believe)
>> > > > > > > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of those
packages. Ya!!
>> > > > > > > > > Of course, that means that I have to have
455 lines of
>> > > > > > > > > "Requires:" and
>> > > > > > > > > 545 lines of "Provides:
bundled()" in the spec file
>> > > > > > > > > Ya!!??
>> > > > > > > > > This spec file just went from a
lightweight to a sumo wrestler in
>> > > > > > > > > one day.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I
know the NodeJS SIG was
>> > > > > > > > working on a macro to automagically create the
"Provides:
>> > > > > > > > bundled()" lines, but I really don't
know if they ever got it
>> > > > > > > > working.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > -Jared
>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> > > > > > > List Guidelines:
>> > > > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > > > > > > List Archives:
>> > > > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> > > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org