Frankly, I think that the current version of the guidelines is fine.
It's much better to have something not quite perfect where we can make
progress than to be permanently stuck. So moving forwards with what we
have suits me.
On 8/27/08, Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Jens Petersen
<petersen(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
>> Because the draft was submitted to us as complete, and we voted on it.
>
> I understood that it was submitted as a draft for comments...
Long ago, i got tired of submitting drafts for comments to have to
wait. I took spot's advice and just submitted them for review and
comment simultaneously. The principle idea was that I put a deadline
on the commenting period, and if there were no comments by a certain
time, then it would go straight to review. This way, two groups of
people got a chance to look at the drafts at the same time.
Finally, it went for a review by the Committee, and they made their
comments. We also discussed your comments. I addressed their
comments, which was the final request for review.
Like I said (accidentally offlist), it's not set in stone either, I'm
still listening.
-Yaakov
_______________________________________________
Fedora-haskell-list mailing list
Fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-haskell-list