Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911725
--- Comment #6 from fedvasu <vadie.developer(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #5)
If I remove it then I will get bug reports from others complaining
"why doesn't Fedora's ghc include the ghc library?".
Like your original report. ;-)
I have no plan to change this. I feel the current behaviour
is what most people would expect.
But if you have a good suggestion for a better name of
the meta-subpackage that doesn't install ghc-ghc-devel
then that would be helpful. (Currently it is "ghc-libraries"
which also provides "ghc-devel".)
What do you use ghc for?
how about ghc-minimal? like it should give,
ghci(interpreter),ghc(compiler),runghc for shebang style-scripts and the
standard libraries with -devel of each of them.
At the time of my original bug-report, I was just learning haskell, I now
prototype data-driven programs in haskell, before writing them in fortran/C.
I used to do that in python previously, even now I use python heavily, just
that haskell is way cooler :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N8TNofZWVV&a=cc_unsubscribe