On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 20:25:19 -0400,
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
I just suggested the rebuilds as best practice. :)
I'll probably be doing one in F14 to get the latest upstream release, once
I get a bit of a lull. So there should be one before release.
> None of the ghc related requires (ghc-dataenc, ghc-network,
ghc-stm,
> ghc-utf8-string) were version specific. Does that indicate that the
> requires
> were set up improperly or just that these packages didn't have an abi
> change?
You should not need those Requires since they are for shared libs.
Rpm would generate them for you automatically: so they should be
redundant. You could pass "-dynamic" to ghc if you want to
link to the shared libraries.
I am pretty sure I had a build fail in F14 when I didn't list ghc-utf8-string
on a build requires. It didn't happen in F13 though.
I'll drop the reuires though if they get built automatically. And I'll
try out using -dynamic.
Thanks for the advice.