----- Original Message -----
| Hi,
|
| On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Rajeesh K Nambiar
| <rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
| > Hi,
| >
| > I'd like to maintain/co-maintain PT Serif[1] and PT Mono[2] fonts by
| > paratype. Would it be better to include them in the existing PT
| > Sans[3] fonts package - incorporate in the same spec as multiple
| > packages, or as individual specs?
| >
| > Here's the altered spec file[4] and srpm[5] combining all 3 paratype
| > fonts. (Note the hack in %prep phase due to source packages containing
| > same file names). What do you think?
| >
|
| We can solve this by either one of following solution
| 1) Rename this package paratype-pt-sans-fonts to paratype-pt-fonts and
| include all 3 types sans, serif, mono in subpackages.
| OR
| 2) Add individual packages, add new package paratype-pt-serif-fonts
| and paratype-pt-mono-fonts.
If upstream ships the archive for them separately, 2) is the way to go for packaging
according to our font packging policy.
|
| Send an email to paratype-pt-sans-fonts package owner and get his
| advice on this update issue.
|
| Regards,
| Parag.
| _______________________________________________
| fonts mailing list
| fonts(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
|
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
|
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
--
Akira TAGOH