https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436077
--- Comment #17 from fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> ---
Thinking this again, maybe 0xfe0e and 0xfe0f are enough instead of 0xfe00 -
0xfe0f.
I'd liked to ask pango people about the following suggestion.
--- pango-1.40.4/pango/pango-context.c.orig 2017-03-30 19:03:28.081488378
+0900
+++ pango-1.40.4/pango/pango-context.c 2017-04-04 13:35:18.446935865 +0900
@@ -1404,6 +1404,15 @@ itemize_state_process_run (ItemizeState
{
shape_engine = NULL;
font = NULL;
+ }
+ /* If an emoji font does not include emoji presentation, let
+ * harfbuzz handle the characters.
+ *
http://www.unicode.org/emoji/charts/emoji-variants.html
+ */
+ else if (G_UNLIKELY (wc == 0xfe0fu || wc == 0xfe0eu))
+ {
+ shape_engine = NULL;
+ font = NULL;
}
else
{
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.