rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel icelandic-fonts.spec,1.5,1.6
by Jon Stanley
Author: jstanley
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30927
Modified Files:
icelandic-fonts.spec
Log Message:
fix having post in specfile
Index: icelandic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel/icelandic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- icelandic-fonts.spec 9 Mar 2009 04:11:36 -0000 1.5
+++ icelandic-fonts.spec 9 Mar 2009 04:15:02 -0000 1.6
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version: 1.001
-Release: 6%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
Summary: Icelandic Magical Staves
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -37,20 +37,13 @@
%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}
-%post
-if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
- %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{_fontdir} || :
-fi
-
-%postun
-if [ $1 -eq 0 -a -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ] ; then
- %{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{_fontdir} || :
-fi
-
%_font_pkg *.otf
%changelog
+* Sun Mar 8 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley(a)gmail.com> - 1.001-7
+- Fix including %%post in here from last fix
+
* Sun Mar 8 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley(a)gmail.com> - 1.001-6
- Use font_pkg macro again
15 years, 3 months
rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel icelandic-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5
by Jon Stanley
Author: jstanley
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29656
Modified Files:
icelandic-fonts.spec
Log Message:
use font_pkg macro again
Index: icelandic-fonts.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/icelandic-fonts/devel/icelandic-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- icelandic-fonts.spec 25 Feb 2009 06:39:21 -0000 1.4
+++ icelandic-fonts.spec 9 Mar 2009 04:11:36 -0000 1.5
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version: 1.001
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?dist}
Summary: Icelandic Magical Staves
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -47,14 +47,13 @@
%{_bindir}/fc-cache -f %{_fontdir} || :
fi
-%files
-%defattr(644,root,root,755)
-%dir %{_fontdir}
-%{_fontdir}/*.otf
-%doc README.license
+%_font_pkg *.otf
%changelog
+* Sun Mar 8 2009 Jon Stanley <jonstanley(a)gmail.com> - 1.001-6
+- Use font_pkg macro again
+
* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 1.001-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
15 years, 3 months
[Bug 477395] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: hanazono-fonts
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 3 months
[Bug 477450] [rosegarden4] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450
Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |oget.fedora(a)gmail.com
AssignedTo|seg(a)haxxed.com |oget.fedora(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com> 2009-03-07 03:27:25 EDT ---
I got ACL for this package and I made an attempt to separate the fonts:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1228226
There are 3 .pfa fonts in this package are, two of them are derived from
lilypond's feta fonts and 1 is derived from lilypond's parmesan fonts. It is
fairly difficult to produce these .pfa files from source .mf files.
Two of these fonts can be converted from .pfb files (that are available in
lilypond builds) to .pfa files, but unfortunately lilypond's current tarball
doesn't contain the sources for the last font (feta-nummer10) anymore. Note
that lilypond only offers .pfb files and no .pfa files.
I also saw that the glyph names are modified from the original lilypond source
files. Well, maybe the names of these glyphs were so in an older version of
lilypond. So, there is a tiny possibility that if we were to use the current
lilypond fonts, rosegarden might misbehave.
Hence I made two subpackages
rosegarden4-feta-fonts (contains 2 .pfa files)
rosegarden4-parmesan-fonts (contains 1 .pfa file)
Let me know if I need to do any other changes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 3 months
[Bug 445176] New: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445176
Summary: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the
pre based glyph
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: lohit-fonts
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aalam@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-
bugs-list@redhat.com,petersen(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to form the pre based glyph, instead
the conjunct, 0D4D and 0D30 just appear in key sequence.
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. In gedit, type 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30
Actual results:
In the above step, when 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30 is typed the conjunct
0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 is followed by 0D4D and 0D30.
Expected results:
In the above step,when 0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 + 0D4D + 0D30 is typed the conjunct
0D38 + 0D4D + 0D24 must have the pre-based glyph that is formed using 0D4D
and 0D30.
Additional info:
For ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444561
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 3 months
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-03-05 19:42:05 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> 4. you need to drop
> Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freemono-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
> Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freesans-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
> Requires: gnu-free-fonts-freeserif-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
> from your main package
But they should be moved to the compat package.
> 5. you probably don't need to obsolete package names that were never pushed to
> user systems, this obsolete data will never be used
Right, I think you can drop "Obsoletes: gnu-free-fonts < 20090104-4" from
compat too.
Otherwise it looks pretty good to me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 3 months