Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068
--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2009-09-22 01:55:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
- a foo-fangsong-ti-fonts subpackage,
bitmap-cjk-fonts has only fansongti fonts file, should we change it name? like bitmap-cjk-fangsongti-fonts
I'd not mention the cjk bit at all
Also
- it would be probably cleaner to package the ucs fonts in a ucs-fixed-fonts
package instead of hiding their origin in a collection package
can you elaborate more on this, which font exactly?
The readme says fixed is a copy of http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs-fonts.html
If we packaged it today it'd end up in a ucs-fonts or ucs-fixed-fonts srpm, not something else entirely.
Also as Jens wrote we need to de-duplicate with xorg-x11-fonts, but xorg-x11-fonts is another package that needs reorganisation