Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068
--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-09-22
01:55:34 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
> 2. a foo-fangsong-ti-fonts subpackage,
bitmap-cjk-fonts has only fansongti fonts file, should we change it name?
like bitmap-cjk-fangsongti-fonts
I'd not mention the cjk bit at all
> Also
> - it would be probably cleaner to package the ucs fonts in a ucs-fixed-fonts
> package instead of hiding their origin in a collection package
can you elaborate more on this, which font exactly?
The readme says fixed is a copy of
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs-fonts.html
If we packaged it today it'd end up in a ucs-fonts or
ucs-fixed-fonts srpm, not something else entirely.
Also as Jens wrote we need to de-duplicate with xorg-x11-fonts, but
xorg-x11-fonts is another package that needs reorganisation
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.