https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277782
--- Comment #3 from Michel Lind <michel(a)michel-slm.name> ---
(In reply to Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho from comment #1)
> Therefore, this is a request to package older clang-formats even
on newer Fedoras.
Notice this is already available on Fedora 40, where clang17-tools-extra
provides /usr/bin/clang-format-17 and clang-tools-extra provides
/usr/bin/clang-format from LLVM 18.1.
Tulio, would you accept a PR that rework the clang16 packaging to be more like
clang17 (and thus clang16-tools-extra is shipped?
I also have colleagues who need clang16 binaries that are currently unshipped
(In reply to Alyssa Rosenzweig from comment #2)
Maybe enforcing clang-format use in CI wasn't such a great idea
after all...
Having dealth with this on Python projects, yeah, formatting and linting checks
are ... very flaky
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277782
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...